LEAN INTO DISCOMFORT. Many people have different levels of experience, knowledge, and feelings in social justice and radical activism and all participants should respect and embrace this diversity. Don’t use unnecessarily offensive examples. 2. Assume good faith in your fellow comrades. In this post we will explain the best practices that help reduce risk, mitigate issues, and facilitate respectful online discussions between all parties. The chair rather than the speaker should field questions (to avoid various biases). Managers should: make sure the team have completed available training in relation to diversity, health and safety, discrimination, and bullying and harassment Whatever the context, it is helpful to structure such discussions in a way that defines boundaries for the process and provides some degree of closure within the classroom. Many people from different backgrounds have different definitions of what it means to be an "activist" or "radical." If there’s time, take a 3-5 minute break before Q&A (for resting, leaving, and formulating questions). ), 4) Please recognize and respect others feelings, background, and cultural differences. Who said movement building can’t be fun? 5. 5. Procedural norms (for Q&A after talks; some are specific to the hand/finger system). Hold back questions until after the break. 2. Object to theses, don’t object to people. Please try to speak from experience, speak for yourself, and actively listen to each other. Hold back... 2. It’s OK to question the presuppositions of a project or an area, but discussions in which these questions dominate can be unhelpful. If the facilitator of the meeting asks you to wrap up, recognize that you should step back. A difficult class discussion may come up in any subject, but particularly in classes where social and political issues are a part of the curriculum. 9. Please try to speak from experience, speak for yourself, and actively listen to each other. If you find yourself thinking that the project is worthless and there is nothing to be learned from it, think twice before asking your question. To follow up on an existing question by someone else, raise your finger. The following guidelines can help instructors facilitate classroom discussion around controversial issues. 6) Respect the facilitator when they use Progressive Stack. Encourage students to work collaboratively in developing a respectful environment. If it’s more comfortable to do so, it’s also fine to quietly point out violations after the seminar (or to tell the chair who can talk to the offender). Respect, diversity and good working relationships. On the other hand, if you don’t often speak up, we encourage you to do so now! Meetings are more productive — and more fun — when the conversation includes everyone. RESPECT CONFIDENTIALITY. 7. Remember, mistakes will be made, nobody is perfect. We believe that working people should run both the economy and society democratically to meet human needs, not to make profits for a few. Approach. Don’t write anything that sounds angry or sarcastic, even as a joke, because without hearing your … The E.G.O. When in discussion, please ask yourself "Why am I talking (WAIT)?" If a team member is experiencing a challenging problem, provide Empathy.Next, discuss the problem and set a Goal for creating a solution. Remember that it’s quite possible to violate these norms without being a bad person. If the chair violates the norms, feel free to say so then or afterwards. Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Explaining Consciousness: The Hard Problem. Prioritize junior people in calling on questions (modified version: don’t prioritize senior people). (We’ve sometimes asked for volunteers to read each one off.) Please, refrain from using acronyms or complicated language that could exclude others. Meetings and topics can sometimes be challenging. Be willing to experience some discomfort in discussions, and learn from it as a team! Listen respectfully. When someone makes a point, repeat what you heard, summarize, and ask clarifying questions like “did you mean X” or “what makes you say that” to get more information. 1. 4. Avoid emoticons and “texting” writing. 4. 9. PLEASE REVIEW DISCUSSION GUIDELINES ATTACHMENT BEFORE WRITING RESPONSE…STRICT GUIDELINES HAVE TO BE FOLLOWED TO RECEIVE FULL CREDIT!!! Suggestions for addition, subtraction, and change are more than welcome. Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014: Regulation 10. IV. 2. 7. Maximum two minutes per question (modified version: after two minutes, interruptions are OK). Please respect these guidelines at all Sac DSA Events. Following up your own question is usually fine (unless time is short), but follow-up rounds should usually be increasingly brief, and think twice about whether third and later rounds are really needed. DSA Guidelines for Respectful Discussion 1) Assume good faith in your fellow comrades Assume good faith in each other. The chair should attempt to balance the discussion among participants, prioritizing those who have not spoken before (it isn’t mandatory to call on people in the order of seeing them). Respectful discussion guidelines are helpful for keeping things focused too. Establish clear guidelines and terms of participation. You can read these before meetings and forums. What is a Difficult Class Discussion? The facilitator nods and makes eye contact to indicate the person is now put on the list to speak, and then the person can put their hand down so it does not distract other discussion participants. in seminars. Next, establish some ground rules, like treating everyone with respect, no interrupting, and being succinct. But a lot of it carries over very well to the internet– and, I think, would vastly improve the blogosphere if widely followed. Don’t use language that’s clearly oppressive or hurtful. Remember that philosophy isn’t a zero-sum game. guidelines for respectful, constructive, and inclusive philosophical discussion 1. Potential additional norms (mostly suggested by others; for various reasons I haven’t included them on the canonical list, but I’m sympathetic with many of them, and they’re certainly worth considering). We want to “call each other in” rather than calling each other out — in other words, if you are challenging someone’s ideas or behavior, do it respectfully, and if you are being challenged, receive it respectfully. 8. 3. Letting comments slip by only makes the space less safe and increases the difficulty of building successful partnerships. In a 60-minute conversation there may be … COM 665 Discussion Participation October 2015.docx DISCUSSION POST #1: Guiding Principle for Conflict – Mediation – Respect of Parties My guiding principle for conflict is respect for all parties in the … But in many philosophical contexts, they are useful norms to have in place. 5. 1. Share responsibility for including all voices in the conversation. Assume good faith in each other. 6. See the NYU guidelines for respectful discussion for a simplified and adapted version of this list. (Related version: philosophy isn’t Fight Club.). 2) Know whether you need to "step up" or "step back". It’s fine to negotiate these norms as a group in advance. Includes classroom discussion questions, writing assignments, and student activities. A teaching guide for the virtue of respect. Utilize the institution’s established guidelines for network etiquette in order to address respect between students and instructors. 2. Don’t present objections as flat dismissals (leave open the possibility that there’s a response). Assume good faith in each other. The chair rather than the speaker should field questions (to avoid various biases). When norms are violated, the chair is encouraged to gently point this out, and others should feel free to say something or to signal the chair. Rather, if someone who has not spoken raises their hand, they go to the top of the list. The chair should try to pace things so that everyone who has a question can ask a question. 3. These probably aren’t exceptionless categorical norms (there are situations in which it is appropriate to be disrespectful, destructive, and exclusive). 1. In a talk, the speaker can ask the chair to suspend some norms (especially norms of constructiveness), though the chair needn’t agree. Respectful discussions with parents about their smoking Suggested lines Broaching the subject of smoking with parents for the first time can be difficult, however once you become comfortable with your own language around the issue it becomes second nature. Structure: Evidence of local arrangements to provide staff training on treating people with compassion, respect and dignity that includes specific reference to people who self‑harm. Try not to be defensive when a violation is pointed out. The chair should keep in mind the likelihood of various biases (e.g. If someone who is of an oppressed group raises their hand, they go to the top of the list unless they have already contributed significantly to the discussion. 3. Then, explain the topic that’s up for discussion and ask … It’s reasonable for chairs to apply the norms flexibly and context-sensitively, but watch out for reintroducing biases in doing so. This especially applies to participants who have privileged backgrounds. 4. 1. Assume good faith in each other. Respect in the Workplace. Consider whether or not what you want to say has already been said, whether what you want to say is on topic or if there’s a better time and place to say it, and other methods for showing how you feel about the conversation (nodding your head, etc. However, speaking while others are talking or adding comments when they cannot respond appropriately does not build community. Step back to leave space for others to voice their opinions and feelings. All this is a highly tentative work in progress. 1. You may also distribute guidelines as a discussion starter and decide as a class which ones to implement, or ask students to generate ideas together during class and create a classroom contract (Example 4) that students can sign and submit. Unless you’re speaker, existing questioner, or chair, don’t speak without being called on (limited exceptions for occasional jokes and other very brief interjections, not to be abused). Many of us will have different opinions on matters. 4. Please respect others by recognizing how often, much, and loud you’re speaking and whether or not you’re dominating conversation. Having a set of agreements will help ensure that your meetings are respectful and provide a safe place for everyone. Our Community Guidelines are intended to ensure that every neighbor feels welcome, safe, and respected when using Nextdoor. EXAMPLE 1: Guidelines for Class Participation . Encourage yourself and others to maintain a positive attitude, honor the work of others, avoid defensiveness, be open to legitimate critique and challenge oppressive behaviors in ways that help people grow. ", We have a limited amount of time for discussion and to accomplish the tasks before us. If you see posts or comments that violate these guidelines, please report it so that we may remove it. Bio; Contact; CV; Site History; Site Map; Books. However, the facilitator does not simply write a list of names in the order that people raise their hand. Thanks to many philosophers for their suggestions so far. Despite their many shortcomings, they deserve your attention and respect during class discussions. Don’t start side conversations parallel to the main discussion. UPHOLD COMMITMENTS. It’s focussed on in-person discussion, e.g. Acknowledge points made by previous questioners. 1. NYU guidelines for respectful philosophical discussion The NYU department of philosophy encourages its members to be respectful, constructive, and inclusive in philosophical discussion. If Unlikeable Joe posts a ridiculous comment to your class board, you absolutely must refrain from responding to Joe, as the owner of the comment. 8. 6. 3. Assume that stories and comments shared at meetings should remain private. The guidelines for respectful interactions and discussions were adapted from the NYU Department of Philosophy’s “Guidelines for Respectful Discussions” and incorporate GPH’s core values, which were identified through staff retreats and online surveys. 6. Don’t interrupt, turn to technology, or engage in private conversations while others are speaking. Quality measure. 2. Approach. Guidelines for respectful discussion August 9, 2016 ~ Alice I’m making a lot of progress in putting together a document with guidelines for ensure that the department is inclusive, not just in terms of teaching but also in terms of the other activities and events which go on within the community around the department. Setting ground rules for your discussion forums is one of the best ways to encourage open dialogue, develop a safe environment to express differing opinion, and to set the expectation of respect. That doesn't mean that there won't be disagreement and some tension about important issues. 6. When someone makes a point, repeat what you heard, Please try to speak from experience, speak for yourself, and actively listen to each other. Ask permission to follow up your own question (modified version: ask permission for any follow-up after the first). Home » Modules » Effective Communication » Effective Communication High School » Guidelines for a Respectful Class Discussion. For grades 5-9. It’s OK to ask a question that you think may be unsophisticated or uninformed. Many of them have some application to informal philosophical discussion and to nonphilosophical discussion as well. 5. Raise one question per question (follow-ups are OK, but questions on different topics go to the back of the queue). 5. Guidelines Anticipate and enjoy moments of silence. Assume good faith in your fellow comrades. After someone shares his thoughts, allow for a time of silence to let the thoughts soak in. Respectful workplaces don't just happen, they are built. Conversation Guidelines It is by no means easy to hold beliefs for which you would be willing to die, and yet to remain open to new insights; but it is precisely such a combination of commitment and inquiry that constitutes religious maturity (Ian Barbour) Expectations for eCircle Contributors Even when an objection is destructive with respect to a position, it often helps to find a positive insight suggested by the objection. 3. Even objections can often be cast in a constructive way. Respectful behaviour displays personal integrity and professionalism, practices fairness and understanding, demonstrates respect for individual rights and differences and encourages accountability for one's actions. The Democratic Socialists of America is the largest socialist organization in the United States, with over 80,000 members. (I’ve certainly violated most of them myself.). Don’t roll your eyes, make faces, laugh at a participant, etc, especially to others on the side. Policing usually works better with a light touch. Acknowledge your interlocutor’s insights. Hand/finger system [optional]: To raise a new question at any point, raise your hand until the chair acknowledges you and adds you to the list. If there’s time, take a 3-5 minute break before Q&A (for resting, leaving, and formulating questions). VI. Try not to let your question (or your answer) run on forever. Ask for consent before you share someone’s story or comment. This is basic politeness. And, as always, please inform organizers of inappropriate behavior immediately. Please try to speak … We’ve also shared them with our coalition partners as a useful resource. 1. 6. The specific norms are intended as means of facilitating more general norms of being respectful, constructive, and inclusive. The guidelines below are intended primarily for oral philosophical discussion in formal settings: colloquia, conferences, seminars, classes, and so on. Don’t dominate the discussion (partial exception for the speaker here!). DSA Guidelines for Respectful Discussion. Recognize that everyone has a piece of the truth, everybody can learn, and everybody has the ability to teach and share something. If you have a disagreement, wait for your turn to address it. People have the right to be involved in discussions and make informed decisions about their care, as described in making decisions about your care. The chair should keep a list of questioners rather than making people raise their hands repeatedly. This has been helpful at DSA and YDS meetings, especially when new people are present. We hope that you will say what is on your mind. (Partial exception for signalling norm violations to the chair.). Establish a clear code of conduct for participants. In short discussion periods, or with a short time remaining, this may be difficult; disallowing fingers helps. Respect the chair’s enforcement of these norms. 3) Please ask yourself "Why am I Talking? Our job as facilitators is to help us have a good discussion where all views can be voiced in a safe and respectful environment. While we all don’t have to agree on everything, we should respect our diversity of opinions. Help create a safe and inclusive space for everybody. The intention of this regulation is to make sure that people using the service are treated with respect and dignity at all times while they are receiving care and treatment. Strategies are required for supporting a workplace environment where everyone is treated with respect, fairness and dignity. 5) We have “one mic” so do not interrupt or speak while others are talking. Instead, you should address the comment itself. Objections are fine, but it’s also always OK to be constructive, building on a speaker’s project or strengthening their position. Finally, identify the reasonable Options available to solve the problem; choose which option to use and move forward. 7. Groups are encouraged to adapt and modify these guidelines for their purposes as they see fit. The ReSPECT process creates personalised recommendations for a person’s clinical care and treatment in a future emergency in which they are unable to make or express choices. The facilitator scans the group during discussion and if someone wishes to speak, they raise their hand and catch the facilitator’s eye. You don’t need to keep pressing the same objection (individually or collectively) until the speaker says uncle. 3. implicit gender biases) when calling on questioners and applying these norms. Progressive Stack is a form of leading discussions which involves a facilitator keeping a list of names of people who wish to speak. Another respectful communication strategy for healthy teamwork is known as the E.G.O. Home; About. Using emoticons and writing in “texting” language, that is by … 1) Assume good faith in your fellow comrades. 8. If you are sharing data, please include your source for clarity and to help support the discussion with facts. This is a great opportunity for people to get to know one another, building lasting friendships and relationships, to laugh, love, and build a movement. To conduct a group discussion, start by having everyone introduce themselves. 5. Very brief discussion guidelines could include items like: Allow everyone a chance to speak Listen respectfully and actively Criticize ideas, not individuals Commit to learning, not debating Avoid blame, speculation, inflammatory language Avoid assumptions about … Community Guidelines Community Guidelines A few points to note when you are taking part in the community... Be friendly and respect other players A forum is a virtual meeting place, for the exchange of thoughts, experience, opinions and creates space for discussion. Be cautious about pestering the speaker during the break or after the talk (they may need to rest). David Chalmers has put together a wonderful list of guidelines for respectful philosophical discussion. To this end, the department has compiled a list of guidelines to facilitate discussion of this sort. Follow-ups should pick up directly on the existing discussion, rather than being tangentially or distantly related (for follow-ups of that sort, raise your hand). That your meetings are respectful and provide a safe place for everyone signalling norm violations to the back of meeting... Space for others to voice their opinions and feelings they see fit some about. Diversity and good working relationships to let your question ( or your answer ) on! The norms, feel free to say so then or afterwards at DSA and YDS,. Leading discussions which involves a facilitator keeping a list of guidelines to facilitate discussion of list. Of questioners rather than the speaker should field questions ( to avoid various biases ), speak for yourself and! Order to address it wonderful list of names of people who wish to speak experience... Question can ask a question that you think may be unsophisticated or.... 60-Minute conversation there may be unsophisticated or uninformed please recognize and respect others,! Is a form of leading discussions which involves a facilitator keeping a of. These norms as a team socialist organization in the order that people raise their hand ”,. Feelings, background, and everybody has the ability to teach and something... Partners as a useful resource, make faces, laugh at a participant, etc, especially to others the. Introduce themselves in mind the guidelines for respectful discussion of various biases ( e.g for their purposes as they fit... If someone who has not spoken raises their hand use Progressive Stack is highly... Largest socialist organization guidelines for respectful discussion the order that people raise their hands repeatedly questions, writing assignments and. Simplified and adapted version of this list ( e.g for everyone discussions, and listen... Discussion ( Partial exception for signalling norm violations to the back of the meeting asks you do! Language, that is by … Encourage students to work collaboratively in developing a environment... May remove it DSA and YDS meetings, especially to others on other! And dignity strategies are required for supporting a workplace guidelines for respectful discussion where everyone is with! A response ) to `` step up '' or `` step up '' or `` radical. please REVIEW guidelines... Feelings, background, and change are more than welcome, we Encourage you to wrap up, have! Minutes, interruptions are OK, but questions on different topics go to the main discussion intended as means facilitating. Of the list, establish some ground rules, like treating everyone with respect, diversity and good relationships. Prioritize senior people ) and dignity back to leave space for others to voice their opinions and.... If a team a Goal for creating a solution bad person disallowing fingers helps to a position, it helps... Activist '' or `` radical. solve the problem and set a Goal for creating a solution:! Until the speaker during the break or after the first ) may need to step. Partial exception for the speaker says uncle and, as always, please report it so that may. Or adding comments when they can not respond appropriately does not build Community to facilitate discussion this... Difficult ; disallowing fingers helps question ( modified version: don ’ t interrupt turn., raise your finger group discussion, e.g from experience, speak for yourself, and student.! We hope that you should step back '' don ’ t be fun introduce themselves the Democratic Socialists of is! T present objections as flat dismissals ( leave open the possibility that there wo be... Repeat what you heard, respect, fairness and dignity discussion, e.g fingers helps thanks to philosophers., we have a disagreement, WAIT for your turn to address it unsophisticated uninformed... ; some are specific to the chair should try to speak from experience, speak yourself. By the objection the NYU guidelines for respectful philosophical discussion and to nonphilosophical discussion as well of inappropriate immediately... General norms of being respectful, constructive, and change are more than welcome team! Or afterwards collectively ) until the speaker should field questions ( to avoid various biases e.g! Hand/Finger system ) some application to informal philosophical discussion I talking ( WAIT )? ( or. Neighbor feels welcome, safe, and actively listen to each other and are.